Can the informal economy be exchanged into an "economic liberation"?

The informal economy in South Africa, with its deep-rooted historical ties to the liberation economy fighting apartheid, commands respect. The economic activities within this informal economy, which intersect with liberation crime activities, were used as additional funding to counter Africa's formal economic exclusivity.

South Africa's liberation economic activities have evolved and now include traditional terrorist crime activities used as additional funding by liberation movements. GNU's "clampdown" seems to be a significant contributor to the current increase in crime activities associated with additional financing of terrorists. The police approach to killing suspects involved in these specific crime activities seems to support the narrative that the securitisation apparatus treats these criminals as terrorists.

Terrorists from all over Africa can be identified by the crime activities they engage in, which can be used for additional funding to undermine GNU. Africa is on the brink of partnering with the open-border policies of the EU, interlacing with the crime networks and even opening new crime activities.

There is only one effective way of dealing with these terrorists masquerading as criminals: equality before the law and addressing corporate greed. This is a crucial step in combating philanthropists' involvement in creating an environment for lawlessness "for the greater good".

The police's inability to appoint a Crime Intelligence head in Gqeberha contributed to the significant increase in crime. Businesses installing cameras should be arrested for fake solutions. This is a typical problem with companies trying to fix the problem but making money from the misfortunes of others. Gqeberha is following the "pie in the sky" project in Cape Town.